Alumbrados – The Illuminated

Why can’t people think? I am surprised that I have discoverd the proof of the forgeries and yet hundreds, thousands of churches, dare I say MILLIONS of churches and members and their and pastors have not. Whats behind this blindness? Whats behind this apathy? Spiritual ‘demons’ or just plain instructions from above not to meddle? I believe it is the latter—

THE VERDICT

The King James Bible otherwise known as the Authorised Version is the only true version of the bible. Translators of other bibles use forged Egyptian manuscripts.

The true manuscript is the King James ‘Textus Receptus’ manuscript. The King James is the only bible that survived on its own for 300 years. It is also called the Received Text. If a bible is not in English, then translators must still use the Received Text manuscript. But not the forged Egyptian manuscript of Westcott and Hort. Westcott and Hort worked solely from forged documents in 1881, called ‘Vaticanus’ and ‘Sinaiticus’. They replaced the Received Text.

These forged documents were made to create confusion and raised doubts about what God says in the true Received Text.

Today, translators use these forged documents to produce the commonly accepted modern bibles. The same sixteen verses are removed from the New International Version, the Revised Standard Version, the Good News Translation and many others. The sixteen WHOLE missing verses is the clear mark of the forgeries. Modern translators also copy or remove other bits and pieces as they think fit, from the King James bible.

The United Bible Societies (UBS) was established in 1946 to improve cooperation between the various societies. The main ones were The American Bible Society formed in 1816 and The British and Foreign Bible Society formed in 1804. UBS now has a global alliance of at least 130 Bible Societies. This alliance includes most national bible societies around the world. UBS has distributed in over 2200 languages an estimated 7 billion modern bibles. But the UBS text (NU-Text) is almost identical to the forged Westcott and Hort text of 1881. UBS replaced the Received Text after 1881.

The penny dropped…

As my research into Bible translations went on, I discovered that there was a major flaw in what modern bible translators had done. They had said that bible verses had been added to the original BY MISTAKE, while King James supporters said the same verses had in fact been removed from the original BY CONSPIRACY. To decided which group was correct, I had to stand back and think:

If verses were added to the original by mistake, then whoever added them must have also made them verses (numbered them) for them to be verses. This would suggest the same person must have also numbered all the other verses of the bible too. What I soon discovered though, was that the person who allegedly added the verses was not the same person who numbered them into verses afterwards. So there must have been a conspiracy, and not a mistake. Thus I came to the conclusion that the first group of people were wrong who said that verses had been added to the original BY MISTAKE. I logically concluded that this could only have been done BY CONSPIRACY. This cancelled the testimony of the first group of people who said that verses had been added to the original BY MISTAKE. I further concluded that the verses had to have been removed from the original after the verses were made (numbered) in 1551. So a great forgery had taken place not in Alexandria in the 4th century, but in the Vatican in modern times.

Additions can’t have been made to the King James Bible … These verses were removed after they were made verses in the year 1551 AD …

Publishers of modern bibles say that Erasmus created the greek manuscript of the King James Bible, and he corrupted it before he died in 1536. He was the only possible candidate. They say that the “extra” verses in the King James were added by Erasmus to make the King James Bible. … But Everyone will agree Erasmus does not create the verse divisions of the bible, even though his additions are conveniently whole verses. … Fifteen years after Erasmus’ death, Stephens picks up Erasmus’ manuscript and creates the verse divisions in 1551. Co-incidentally, he labels Erasmus’ additions as whole verses. … 400 years later, the New American Standard Bible confirms the blunder of modern bible publishers, that Erasmus added WHOLE verses – before they were made verses. Verses are numbered in sequence so they could not have been added after. … Stephens is criticised by opponents that his verse divisions do not make sense, that they are almost randomly done without logic. Thus Stephens randomly selects verse divisions which co-incidentally match Erasmus’ additions fifteen years earlier. … Stephens does this on horseback… COPY THIS PAGE AND PASS IT ON.

The same verses are removed in every modern bible because every modern bible relies on the same modern greek source … This modern greek source is not the original bible. The only bible which uses the original greek source is the King James Bible, which has all the 16 verses. … This is very serious because it means the original greek source has been intentionally altered after 1551. Who knows what else has been altered in the modern bible? … The modern bible has seriously altered Matthew 16:20. It removes the name of Jesus from this verse. It should read ‘Jesus the Christ’ … Other serious verses have been altered where the name of Jesus is intentionally removed. They are – Matthew 8:29, Acts 3:26, Acts 9:29, Acts 19:10, Romans 15:8, Romans 16:18, 1 Corinthians 5:5, 1 Corinthians 16:22, 2 Corinthians 4:6, 2 Corinthians 5:18, Ephesians 3:9, Ephesians 3:14, Colossians 1:2, Colossians 1:28, 2 Timothy 4:22, Philemon 1:6, 1 Peter 5:10, 1 Peter 5:14 … We should only use the original bible, and not a bible which has been intentionally altered. We could bring a serious judgment on ourselves if we use a false bible. …

The verse divisions of the New Testament were made by Robert Estienne (better known to us as Stephens) in 1551: “The Stephanic verses have met with bitter criticism because of the fact that they break the text into fragments, the division often coming in the middle of the sentence, instead of forming it into convenient and logical paragraphs,” The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge (New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1908-1912), volume 2, pages 113-14.

Get Erasmus

According to the above extract, bible verses are illogically defined. Suppose the 16 WHOLE VERSES I have mentioned were added by Erasmus, or by anyone else. Robert Stephens would need to know about it beforehand. Because Stephens carefully defines the additions as WHOLE VERSES in 1551. He must have known about the bits Erasmus added. Did he know Erasmus? Erasmus died in 1536.

THE CONSPIRACY:

1. Erasmus adds bits of sentence to the original manuscript
   (16 bits and pieces, here and there) 
2. Erasmus tells Stephens where these bits and pieces begin and end within the giant Erasmus manuscript 
3. Erasmus convinces Stephens. Stephens agrees to do it 
4. Stephens defines Erasmus 16 additions individually as WHOLE VERSES. He then creates the giant manuscript with verse divisions 
5. Stephens then publishes it. 
6. Obviously the conspiracy is not done in person, because Erasmus is dead at the time.

The only other possibility is that these 16 verses were subtracted after 1551.

This means that some time after 1551, some person or persons deleted the WHOLE VERSES (what a blunder).

I got it!

What really convinced me:

  
1. 14 out of 16 verses are whole verses 
2. Stephens defines them in 1551 as whole verses 
3. There is a much greater chance that he would have ‘missed’ the bits Erasmus (or any other monk) added 
4. But he did not miss the bits. So you have to include Stephens in on making the ‘additions’ 
5. This means he would have to be present every time a verse was added. 
6. This implies a conspiracy (not a mistake by Roman Catholic Monks) 
7. Or there was no conspiracy at all. This means that the verses were subtracted after they became verses (after 1551). 
8. Verses can only be missing if they are verses in the first place!

To repeat what the New American Standard Bible says 14 times:

“Early mss do not contain this VERSE“

The Beastly (RC) Emblem of the Phantom Bible
Rooted in the Saturn worship of pagan Rome, every non-King James modern Bible, including the New King James bears this indelible mark. Sometimes called ‘Leningrad’. It is“The Sign of The End”

The Beastly (RC) Emblem of the Phantom Bible