The United States GOVERNMENT has actually responded and discredited the evidence presented below (do a google search “Thierry Meyssan missile hit pentagon”). Why would they pay so much attention to such a silly story? However, Thierry Meyssan did not realise he was playing with the big boys. Now he’s in for it.

read more | digg story

The United States GOVERNMENT has actually responded and discredited the evidence presented below (do a google search “Thierry Meyssan missile hit pentagon”). Why would they pay so much attention to such a silly story? However, Thierry Meyssan did not realise he was playing with the big boys. Now he’s in for it. The United Nations cannot help him either - it’s the Alumbrados who controls both.

THE EVIDENCE:
One hole, 2 ½ yards in diameter… But no plane

Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ½ yards in diameter. But whatever it was, is no-where to be found.

The exit hole

The three photographs below show the hole through which the device or craft exited the building. The photograph’s caption is clear on this point: “The exit hole where American Airlines Flight 77 finally stopped after penetrating the Pentagon”. The second photograph shows the same hole after debris was removed. The words “Punch out” have been added. The hole is quite circular and is about 2 ½ yards in diameter.

The position of the hole

The two photographs below and their enlargements show the location of this hole on the inside wall of the third ring. The condition of the windows and the inscriptions on the right can be compared to the photographs above. High definition enlargements of these images may be downloaded here (photo 1) (photo 2):

Photo 1:

Photo 2:

What kind of aircraft caused this damage ?

POSSIBLE THEORIES:
Aircraft nose or warhead ?

The Pentagon states that the round hole visible on the third building was caused by the nose of a Boeing 757. This hypothesis is however not technically possible.

The device entered the first floor of the building, producing a huge fireball, before penetrating two highly resistant buildings leaving an exit hole 2 ½ yards wide. What kind of device is capable of doing this?

According to the official version, the hole was produced by an airliner – a Boeing 757-200.

Lee Evey, head of the Pentagon renovation project, explained how this happened at a press conference on September 15. “The rings are E, D, C, B and A. Between B and C is a driveway that goes around the Pentagon. It’s called A-E Drive. The airplane traveled in a path about like this, and the nose of the aircraft broke through this innermost wall of C ring into A-E Drive. […] The nose of the plane just barely broke through the inside of the C ring, so it was extending into A-E Drive a little bit. So that’s the extent of penetration of the aircraft.”

Contradictions

The official version is complex and contradicts itself, so read on carefully.

To justify the absence of Boeing debris, the authorities explained that the aircraft was pulverized when it impacted with such a highly reinforced building as the Pentagon.
To explain the disappearance of the aircraft’s more resistant components, like the engines or brakes, we were told that the aircraft melted (with the exception of one landing light and its black boxes).
To justify the absence of 100 tons of melted metal, experts attempted to show that the fire exceeded 2500 °C, leading to the evaporation of parts of the aircraft (but not of the building itself or, clearly, of the landing light or black boxes).
To justify the presence of the hole, officials now state that it was caused by the nose of the aircraft, which, despite the rigors of the crash, continued careering through the three buildings.

The aircraft thus disintegrated on contact with the Pentagon, melted inside the building, evaporated at 2500° C and still penetrated two other buildings via a hole 2 ½ yards in diameter. Questions need to be asked of Pentagon experts here. The official version has its own holes that need filling.

The nose of an aircraft ?

Let us imagine for a moment that we had not been told that the aircraft had disintegrated, melted and evaporated. The question then is: Is it possible for the nose of an airliner to penetrate three buildings and, as it leaves the third, produce a perfectly circular hole, 2 ½ yards wide ?

The nose of an aircraft, the radome, contains its electronic navigation equipment. To enable the transmission of signals, the nose is not made of metal but carbon. Its shape has been designed to be aerodynamic but is not crash resistant. The inside casing, as well as its contents, are extremely fragile. The nose would crush on impact with an obstacle, not penetrate it.

It is not actually possible to find the nose of an aircraft after such an impact. So it is not an aircraft nose that could have produced the hole visible in the third ring of the building.

Traversing three buildings

Some kind of craft did indeed penetrate the three buildings. The upper floors of the outer ring collapsed over a block of about 20 yards, half an hour after the attack. The two inner rings seemed to have been damaged by the fire which subsequently broke out. They did not cave in. The device, which landed on the Pentagon, did not demolish it but penetrated it.

An aircraft would have demolished the building rather than penetrate the walls. The question is: What type of device would have been capable of producing such damage? One possible answer is a missile. Missiles have heads that are much stronger than aircraft noses. They are made from depleted uranium and are designed for penetration. Depleted uranium is an extremely dense metal that friction heats up, increasing its penetrative capacities. Such missiles are particularly used to enter bunkers. An aircraft crashes and breaks apart whereas a missile of this type will penetrate its target.

I say again:

How could Osama Bin Laden manoevre a missile? If not Osama, then why set Afghanistan on fire to find him?

Perhaps this explains the response of the United States Government to discredit this article.

Just in case readers are doubting whether these photos have somehow been doctored, do not ask the American Government - ask the construction companies whether this was in fact the damage caused:

CONTRACT AWARDED TO REBUILD PENTAGON

In addition to the still-to-be-determined total costs of repairing the damage from the terrorist attack, the contract has a potential value of up to $758 million total for renovation of the undamaged portions of the Pentagon, plus adjustments for inflation costs over the estimated 11-year renovation effort. The contract will result in renovation of approximately four million square feet of building space inside the Pentagon, if all options are ultimately exercised.

“With the award of this contract we can begin immediate repairs to the Pentagon and make the necessary improvements that will keep it operational for the next 50 years,” said Lee Evey, Pentagon renovation program manager. “The design-build approach has already demonstrated that it can succeed within this environment.”

Following an intense evaluation of three design-build teams that competed for the job, the Pentagon Renovation Program selected Hensel Phelps Construction Co. based on the company’s superior technical management approach, past performance, and price.

In addition to Hensel Phelps, the design-build team includes Shalom Baranes Associates, HDR Architecture, MC Dean, Studio Architecture, and Southland Industries. The team will have the task of keeping fully operational the world’s largest office building and headquarters for the U.S. military establishment. Working around 20,000 Pentagon employees, the contractor will remove approximately 350 million pounds of debris, demolish Pentagon sections down to the concrete columns and floor slabs, and then rebuild space equivalent to more than two Empire State Buildings as part of the renovation activities.

In addition, the contractor, along with AMEC, the contractor currently accomplishing renovation of areas in Wedge 1, will undertake associated tasks now made necessary by the terrorist attack. For instance, rebuilding floor slabs, rebuilding columns, replicating the historical limestone faade, and rebuilding the roof in the damaged area.

The contractor is expected to begin design work at the end of this month (September 2001). Overall completion of the entire renovation project is expected in December 2012.

QUOTE:

“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists”.

– J. Edgar Hoover, FBI Director 1924-1972, quoted in The Elks Magazine (August 1956)